{"id":17341,"date":"2025-01-17T15:37:31","date_gmt":"2025-01-17T14:37:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/2025\/01\/17\/us-supreme-court-cites-tiktoks-relationship-with-foreign-adversary-in-upholding-sale-or-ban-law-live\/"},"modified":"2025-01-17T15:37:31","modified_gmt":"2025-01-17T14:37:31","slug":"us-supreme-court-cites-tiktoks-relationship-with-foreign-adversary-in-upholding-sale-or-ban-law-live","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/2025\/01\/17\/us-supreme-court-cites-tiktoks-relationship-with-foreign-adversary-in-upholding-sale-or-ban-law-live\/","title":{"rendered":"US supreme court cites TikTok\u2019s relationship with \u2018foreign adversary\u2019 in upholding sale-or-ban law \u2013 live"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The supreme court has allowed to go into effect a law that will force TikTok\u2019s Chinese owner to sell its US business by Sunday, or face a ban<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/jan\/17\/supreme-court-tiktok-ban\">US supreme court issues ruling upholding nationwide ban on TikTok<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/jan\/17\/trump-stop-tiktok-ban\">Can Donald Trump circumvent a TikTok ban?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>TikTok\u2019s attorneys had argued that the first amendment should have protected the social media app from Congress\u2019s legislation that will impose a ban unless its Chinese owner divests.<\/p>\n<p>But the supreme court disagreed, writing that Congress has legitimate concerns with TikTok, and the power to deal with them:<\/p>\n<p>There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community. But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok\u2019s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary. For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitioners\u2019 first amendment rights.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/live\/2025\/jan\/17\/politics-updates-supreme-court-tiktok\">Continue reading&#8230;<\/a><br \/>\n<img src=\"https:\/\/i.guim.co.uk\/img\/media\/23e28193af7c3f2d0ec1154f045cc304be221cdc\/0_80_4032_2420\/master\/4032.jpg?width=140&amp;quality=85&amp;auto=format&amp;fit=max&amp;s=813fdde1459b685da06b9462087cc5b2\" title=\"US supreme court cites TikTok\u2019s relationship with \u2018foreign adversary\u2019 in upholding sale-or-ban law \u2013 live\" \/>The supreme court has allowed to go into effect a law that will force TikTok\u2019s Chinese owner to sell its US business by Sunday, or face a ban<\/p>\n<p>US supreme court issues ruling upholding nationwide ban on TikTok<br \/>\nCan Donald Trump circumvent a TikTok ban?<\/p>\n<p>TikTok\u2019s attorneys had argued that the first amendment should have protected the social media app from Congress\u2019s legislation that will impose a ban unless its Chinese owner divests.<br \/>\nBut the supreme court disagreed, writing that Congress has legitimate concerns with TikTok, and the power to deal with them:<br \/>\nThere is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community. But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok\u2019s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary. For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitioners\u2019 first amendment rights. Continue reading&#8230;Technology | The Guardian<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The supreme court has allowed to go into effect a law that will force TikTok\u2019s Chinese owner to sell its US business by Sunday, or face a ban US supreme court issues ruling upholding nationwide ban on TikTok Can Donald Trump circumvent a TikTok ban? TikTok\u2019s attorneys had argued that the first amendment should have &hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"> <a class=\"\" href=\"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/2025\/01\/17\/us-supreme-court-cites-tiktoks-relationship-with-foreign-adversary-in-upholding-sale-or-ban-law-live\/\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">US supreme court cites TikTok\u2019s relationship with \u2018foreign adversary\u2019 in upholding sale-or-ban law \u2013 live<\/span> Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":17342,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17341"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17341"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17341\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17342"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}