{"id":8861,"date":"2023-02-04T16:38:03","date_gmt":"2023-02-04T15:38:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/2023\/02\/04\/chatgpt-isnt-a-great-leap-forward-its-an-expensive-deal-with-the-devil-john-naughton\/"},"modified":"2023-02-04T16:38:03","modified_gmt":"2023-02-04T15:38:03","slug":"chatgpt-isnt-a-great-leap-forward-its-an-expensive-deal-with-the-devil-john-naughton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/2023\/02\/04\/chatgpt-isnt-a-great-leap-forward-its-an-expensive-deal-with-the-devil-john-naughton\/","title":{"rendered":"ChatGPT isn\u2019t a great leap forward, it\u2019s an expensive deal with the devil | John Naughton"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The new chatbot is generating a lot of hype, but we would do well to consider its human and environmental cost<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes, those who would forget history are condemned to repeat it. For those of us with long memories, the current fuss \u2013 nay hysteria \u2013 surrounding <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2023\/jan\/07\/chatgpt-bot-excel-ai-chatbot-tech\">ChatGPT<\/a> (and \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2022\/nov\/12\/when-ai-can-make-art-what-does-it-mean-for-creativity-dall-e-midjourney\">generative AI<\/a>\u201d generally) rings a bell.<\/p>\n<p>We have been here before: in January 1966, to be precise. That was the moment when Joseph Weizenbaum, a computer scientist at MIT, unveiled <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/ELIZA\">Eliza<\/a>, which would have been called the world\u2019s first chatbot if that term had existed at the time. Weizenbaum wrote the software (in a programming language intriguingly called MAD-SLIP) to demonstrate that communications between humans and computers were inevitably superficial. It did that by providing a text box in which one could exchange typed communications with the machine. Inside the program was a script (christened DOCTOR by Weizenbaum) which parodied the exchanges a patient might have with a psychotherapist who practised the <a href=\"https:\/\/psychology.fandom.com\/wiki\/Rogerian_psychotherapy\">person-centred therapy<\/a> pioneered by Carl Rogers. (The program\u2019s name came from Eliza Doolittle, the cockney lass who was taught to \u201cspeak proper\u201d in Shaw\u2019s play <em>Pygmalion<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2023\/feb\/04\/chatgpt-isnt-a-great-leap-forward-its-an-expensive-deal-with-the-devil\">Continue reading&#8230;<\/a><br \/>\n<img src=\"https:\/\/i.guim.co.uk\/img\/media\/1f11fcac89f10afd1dbced42eec6e62070727f23\/0_79_5540_3324\/master\/5540.jpg?width=140&amp;quality=85&amp;auto=format&amp;fit=max&amp;s=9f6f3fd520b130a054c96db756f12af8\" title=\"ChatGPT isn\u2019t a great leap forward, it\u2019s an expensive deal with the devil | John Naughton\" \/>The new chatbot is generating a lot of hype, but we would do well to consider its human and environmental cost<br \/>\nSometimes, those who would forget history are condemned to repeat it. For those of us with long memories, the current fuss \u2013 nay hysteria \u2013 surrounding ChatGPT (and \u201cgenerative AI\u201d generally) rings a bell.<br \/>\nWe have been here before: in January 1966, to be precise. That was the moment when Joseph Weizenbaum, a computer scientist at MIT, unveiled Eliza, which would have been called the world\u2019s first chatbot if that term had existed at the time. Weizenbaum wrote the software (in a programming language intriguingly called MAD-SLIP) to demonstrate that communications between humans and computers were inevitably superficial. It did that by providing a text box in which one could exchange typed communications with the machine. Inside the program was a script (christened DOCTOR by Weizenbaum) which parodied the exchanges a patient might have with a psychotherapist who practised the person-centred therapy pioneered by Carl Rogers. (The program\u2019s name came from Eliza Doolittle, the cockney lass who was taught to \u201cspeak proper\u201d in Shaw\u2019s play Pygmalion.) Continue reading&#8230;Technology | The Guardian<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The new chatbot is generating a lot of hype, but we would do well to consider its human and environmental cost Sometimes, those who would forget history are condemned to repeat it. For those of us with long memories, the current fuss \u2013 nay hysteria \u2013 surrounding ChatGPT (and \u201cgenerative AI\u201d generally) rings a bell. &hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"> <a class=\"\" href=\"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/2023\/02\/04\/chatgpt-isnt-a-great-leap-forward-its-an-expensive-deal-with-the-devil-john-naughton\/\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">ChatGPT isn\u2019t a great leap forward, it\u2019s an expensive deal with the devil | John Naughton<\/span> Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":8862,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8861"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8861"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8861\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/costops.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}